DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2014-032
Under Honorable Conditions, COMDTINST M1000.6A ART 12-B-18, JKA,
Pattern of Misconduct, RE4
Honorable
None
None
TIS 5 yrs, 2 months, 21 days
Policy Implications _| None
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant was discharged for Pattern Of Misconduct in 2011. The applicant’s complete Personnel Data
Record and Separation Package were available for the Board to review.
After receiving two NJP’s in a 10 month period, the applicant was processed for discharge. The applicant had a
history of not providing adequate support to dependents stemming back to 2008 prior to the issues of neglecting
work and assaulting the spouse. The Board notes that assault and battery in similar scenarios can normally
result in Court-Martial proceedings.
The applicant claims that the assault on spouse was in self defense after being struck, and that the civilian court
dismissed the case. The applicant provided no official documents to support this claim. The NJP results specify
that the spouse had suffered a fractured nose and received stitches.
Additionally in the current petition, a mention of the dependent son being diagnosed with diabetes led to
asking for a voluntary discharge with an Honorable character of service. The separation package does show an
Honorable recommendation from the Sector, but this is due to the pattern of misconduct vice the voluntary plea
on the application and supporting statements. PSC-epm authorized the Discharge with an Under Honorable
Conditions character of service.
The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.
The applicant was notified of the intent to discharge, and the applicant was advised of the rights to an attorney,
the applicant declined to make a statement while not objecting to discharge.
Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: No relief.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 005
In the Fall of 2002, the applicant was found guilty at NJP for illegal use of the government credit card, and assaulting/threatening a fellow Petty Officer. However, the character of service standard for separations with the SPD code of JKN normally results in an Under Honorable Conditions discharge. The reason of Frequent Involvement of a Discreditable Nature is not an official Narrative Reason to be used on the DD-214.
CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 070
The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The Board recommends no relief. Propriety: Discharge was proper.
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 025
In the Fall of 2011, the applicant was counseled on having an inappropriate relationship with a subordinate who was also married. The Board does note that a General Discharge was issued in Block 24 of the applicant’s DD-214. Per previous policy issued in ALCOAST 562/08, a General discharge is no longer considered an official character of service.
CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 054
The applicant received punishment that was no higher than a Summary Court Martial with one guilty plea on the two charges that occurred. The applicant’s committed offense warrants no higher than an Under Honorable Conditions character of service. The General discharge was issued correctly at the time of separation in 2005.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 078
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-078 NAME CURRENT DD-214 Under Honorable Conditions, COMDTINST M1000.4 ART 1.B.17, JKA, Pattern of Misconduct, RE4 a BY DRB CORRECTIONS TIS 3 yrs, 3 months, 18 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Pattern Of Misconduct due to two Non-Judicial punishments within a 2 year period. Thereafter, the SPO issued an Under Honorable Conditions character of Service. Based on the final approval made by EPM, the...
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 029
In 2010, the applicant pled ‘no contest’ in a civilian court to third degree assault consummated by Battery. The Board has no issues with the discharge issued. The local command, intermediate level Commander, and EPM all endorsed the punishment rendered and the subsequent separation.
NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00420
The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 030401: Chief, BUMED authorized the Applicant's discharge general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct [Extracted from case file].030404: Applicant discharged general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct per MILPERSMAN 1910-400 [Extracted from DD Form 214].NO DISCHARGE PACKAGE AVAILABLE...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000402
The NDRB determined that the characterization of service at discharge was appropriate.Accordingly, relief denied.The Applicant was administratively separated from the Naval service due to Misconduct. The NDRB determined that the Applicant was: (1) advised that he was being separated involuntarily for a pattern of misconduct, not that he was electing voluntary separation for a reduction in force; (2) the Applicant was afforded an opportunity to consult with qualified legal representation;...
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 005
The applicant’s complete Personnel Data Record and Separation Package were available for the Board to review. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. tn reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence (to include evidence submitted by the Applicant) to rebut the presumption.
USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500956
He is discharged as non-amenable to treatment. 900510: Forfeiture of pay awarded at NJP on 900315 vacated due to continued misconduct. The Applicant may, however, petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100, concerning a change in the characterization of naval service, if he desires further review of his case.